[bitbake-devel] [PATCH 1/1] bitbake-layers: stop the warning "not been run using the bitbake wrapper..."
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 10 12:45:11 UTC 2011
On Friday 10 June 2011 13:29:24 Richard Purdie wrote:
> We can't add implementation specific information to bitbake I'm afraid
> so we'll need to find a different way to handle this...
Perhaps we could just change sanity.bbclass to check argv[0] somehow (or some
equivalent way to get the current process name) and skip the check if it isn't
"bitbake"? This would have the added bonus of solving the problem for future
tools that use bitbake code in a similar way to bitbake-layers.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the bitbake-devel
mailing list