[bitbake-devel] should we switch off patchwork for oe-core and bitbake projects

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 16:12:54 UTC 2012


On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:04:14AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
> 
> patchwork instance that we have currently handles patches for
> oe-devel, oe-core and bitbake
> layers which use oe-devel maintain and use the patch queues ok so it
> makes sense to have it
> there. But patch flow for oe-core and bitbake is handled differently
> via pull requests. Would it
> make sense to turn it off for these two projects. Is someone using
> patchwork and/or finds
> it useful to have the patchwork catch those patches please let me know

I'm using it sometimes to check if some patch I've sent to list wasn't
overlooked.

But I can live without it if it adds some administrative or other burden
on servers.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/attachments/20120201/b185378e/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the bitbake-devel mailing list