[bitbake-devel] Conflict between BBCLASSEXTEND and named recipes.

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 09:14:22 UTC 2012


On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote:
> There seems to be a bug with available providers when a recipe file
> provides the same name as an extended recipe. The extended version of
> the recipe does not seem to be available at all.
> 
> Example:
> 
> If zlib_1.2.6.bb exists in a layer, with BBCLASSEXTEND="native
> zlib-nativesdk" defined, and zlib-native_1.2.5.bb exists, the version
> 1.2.6 of zlib-native is not selectable at all.
> 
> 
> bitbake -s | grep zlib
> zlib                                                :1.2.6-r0
> zlib-native                                         :1.2.5-r0
> zlib-nativesdk                                      :1.2.6-r0
> 
> Even with PREFERRED_PROVIDER_zlib-naitve = 1.2.6 the results are the
> same. I have been poking around the parser, but really haven't made any
> progress, figured I would poke the list.

I though that setting PREFERRED_VERSION should be enough in this case.

notice that it's not PREFERRED_PROVIDER and you have "naitve"/"native"
typo there. Can you retest with correct form if you haven't already?

Cheers,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy Puhlman
> Montavista Software, LLC.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bitbake-devel mailing list
> bitbake-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/attachments/20120317/26c733a0/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the bitbake-devel mailing list