[bitbake-devel] [PATCH 1/1] git.py: create a branch when checkout

Robert Yang liezhi.yang at windriver.com
Thu Jul 9 05:57:28 UTC 2015


Thanks, I will send a V2.

// Robert

On 07/08/2015 04:28 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 09:28 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>>
>> On 07/08/2015 12:56 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 16:17:42 Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 18:33 -0700, Robert Yang wrote:
>>>>> Create a branch named oebuild_SRCREV when checkout the source, this
>>>>> makes debug easier than "(no branch)" when look into the source.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>    bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py |    3 ++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py
>>>>> index 2e53882..12087dd 100644
>>>>> --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py
>>>>> +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -280,7 +280,8 @@ class Git(FetchMethod):
>>>>>                    runfetchcmd("%s read-tree %s%s" % (ud.basecmd,
>>>>>                    ud.revisions[ud.names[0]], readpathspec), d)
>>>>>                    runfetchcmd("%s checkout-index -q -f -a" % ud.basecmd,
>>>>>                    d)
>>>>>
>>>>>                else:
>>>>> -                runfetchcmd("%s checkout %s" % (ud.basecmd,
>>>>> ud.revisions[ud.names[0]]), d) +                runfetchcmd("%s checkout
>>>>> %s -b oebuild_%s" % (ud.basecmd, \ +
>>>>> ud.revisions[ud.names[0]], ud.revisions[ud.names[0]]), d)>
>>>>>            return True
>>>>
>>>> Would it not make more sense to set the branch to the upstream branch
>>>> name here?
>>>
>>> I'd go one step further, use the upstream branch name and also set it to track
>>> the remote branch as well.
>>
>> Hi Paul and RP,
>>
>> I'm afraid that the ud.revisions[ud.names[0]] which is SRCREV may
>> not point to an upstream branch or tag, please ?
>
> ud.revisions might not, but ud.branches should. I think you want
> something like:
>
> branchcmd = ""
> if not ud.nobranch:
>      branchcmd = "-b %s" % ud.branches[ud.names[0]]
> runfetchcmd("%s checkout %s %s" % (ud.basecmd, ud.revisions[ud.names[0]], branchcmd), d)
>
> However as Paul notes, setting it to track the upstream remote branch
> would also be ideal.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>



More information about the bitbake-devel mailing list