[bitbake-devel] [PATCH] runqueue: Handle cases where siginfo is now a parameter to the hashvadlidate function

[Richard Purdie]

In some cases we need to check specifically for siginfo files, in
some cases we need to check for the actual sstate objects themselves.

Therefore make this a parameter to the function. A fallback to the
previous function style is maintained for now.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py
index 4a1992a..52bb12f 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py
@@ -1205,9 +1205,14 @@ class RunQueue:
             sq_hash.append(self.rqdata.runq_hash[task])
             sq_taskname.append(taskname)
             sq_task.append(task)
-        call = self.hashvalidate + "(sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d)"
         locs = { "sq_fn" : sq_fn, "sq_task" : sq_taskname, "sq_hash" : sq_hash, "sq_hashfn" : sq_hashfn, "d" : self.cooker.expanded_data }
-        valid = bb.utils.better_eval(call, locs)
+        try:
+            call = self.hashvalidate + "(sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d, siginfo=True)"
+            valid = bb.utils.better_eval(call, locs)
+        # Handle version with no siginfo parameter
+        except TypeError:
+            call = self.hashvalidate + "(sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d)"
+            valid = bb.utils.better_eval(call, locs)
         for v in valid:
             valid_new.add(sq_task[v])