[bitbake-devel] [PATCH 1/4] bitbake-selftest: utilize unittest.main better

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 08:41 +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> On 18/08/16 20:03, "Richard Purdie" <
> richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 19:55 +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> > > This simplifies the script, and, gives new features. It is now
> > > possible
> > > to run single test functions, for example. This is nice when
> > > writing
> > > new
> > > test cases.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  bin/bitbake-selftest | 30 ++++++++----------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/bin/bitbake-selftest b/bin/bitbake-selftest
> > > index 1e6f35e..1e615cc 100755
> > > --- a/bin/bitbake-selftest
> > > +++ b/bin/bitbake-selftest
> > > @@ -25,31 +25,17 @@ try:
> > >  except RuntimeError as exc:
> > >      sys.exit(str(exc))
> > >  
> > > -def usage():
> > > -    print('usage: [BB_SKIP_NETTESTS=yes] %s [-v] [testname1
> > > [testname2]...]' % os.path.basename(sys.argv[0]))
> > 
> > Could we at least preserve the usage message which is helpful as I
> > can
> > never remember BB_SKIP_NETTESTS=yes without prompting...
> 
> I didn't find an easy way to add that to the usage string. However,
> patch
> #2 ("bitbake-selftest: add help text for env variable(s)") adds a
> note
> about BB_SKIP_NETTESTS that gets printed if you use --help. Would
> this be
> ok?

Yes, when I sent this I was reading through the patches in order and
hadn't got to 2/4, sorry. I should have read ahead! This should be ok.

Cheers,

Richard