[bitbake-devel] [PATCH] use multiple processes to dump signatures.

Jianxun Zhang jianxun.zhang at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 12 19:33:11 UTC 2017


RP,
I appreciate your multiple hints on the road for this issue! I do _feel_ this patch needs some improvement or tests, but I cannot identify them in my sight. Well, things shouldn’t be such easy with a V1 due to the complexity.

That’s why I have to hand over the burden to you. :-) Feel free to let me know any new possibilities.

I am actually interested in the data you shared. I improved my sig-dumping over 10 times (14.4 sec to 1 sec). Your test should covers other steps, so the improvement on sig dumping is less significant, 325.08 to 93.93 sec.

Maybe we should find some time to investigate any room to speed up the rest in test suite...

Thanks

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 14:54 -0800, Jianxun Zhang wrote:
>> Do you have further suggestion based on my explanation?
>> 
>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10352
> 
> I needed to sit and look at that patch for a while to check a few
> things but I think you have it right. I've been doing some local
> testing and its now queued in -next, thanks!
> 
> Just out of interest, before:
> 
> oe-selftest -r sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_allarch_samesigs_multilib
> 
> 2017-01-12 17:06:18 -   test_sstate_allarch_samesigs_multilib (oeqa.selftest.sstatetests.SStateTests) ... OK (325.084s)
> 
> and after:
> 
> 2017-01-12 16:58:59 -   test_sstate_allarch_samesigs_multilib (oeqa.selftest.sstatetests.SStateTests) ... OK (93.926s)
> 
> and this change should help multiple tests so its a nice improvement!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard




More information about the bitbake-devel mailing list