<div dir="ltr">Well, maintainers.inc is oe-core specific until we have a way to tell bitbake "include every conf/include/maintainers.inc you can find", but if that existed then it's definitely an option for layers.<div><br></div><div>For core, we should be requiring it yes. UPSTREAM_CHECK_* don't *need* to be present as there are defaults, what we should start checking regularly is that checkpkg works (and the selftest does spot most of the failures).</div><div><br></div><div>Ross<br><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 February 2018 at 22:39, akuster808 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:akuster808@gmail.com" target="_blank">akuster808@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think its time we entertain updating new applications and package<br>
updates submissions process.<br>
<br>
If a new package is being added or updated, we should expect<br>
"UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX" to be present. Maybe even include an entry to the<br>
mainainers.inc file?<br>
<br>
This could apply to all layers.<br>
<br>
<br>
What do you thing?<br>
<br>
Mahalo,<br>
<br>
armin<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Openembedded-architecture mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-architecture@<wbr>lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/openembedded-<wbr>architecture</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>