<div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:22 AM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 1 April 2018 at 06:21, Richard Purdie<br>
<<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Following on from sumo and very in keeping with naming schemes, I'm<br>
> therefore proposing we should have the "there" release. This would be<br>
> followed by the "their" release and then the "theyre" release, making<br>
> us really out 'there'! The latter is a bit of a compromise as I'm not<br>
> sure an apostrophe would be easily handled in the branch names.<br>
<br>
I know I'm sounding a bit like a scratched record, but can we try and<br>
keep the names alphabetical?</blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Is there is a reason to stick with ‘t’ for so long </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
sumo -> their -> there -> theyre<br>
<br>
Other than that, +1 from me.<br>
<br>
Ross<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-architecture mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>