[oe-commits] [bitbake] 03/03: providers: Add PREFERRED_RPROVIDER support
git at git.openembedded.org
git at git.openembedded.org
Thu Apr 14 13:39:23 UTC 2016
rpurdie pushed a commit to branch master-next
in repository bitbake.
commit 31ee3de4ae4e70d503b5a9ced095f2f411b0d162
Author: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 14 14:30:52 2016 +0100
providers: Add PREFERRED_RPROVIDER support
Sometimes you can end up in a situation where you need to specify that
a specific runtime entity should be provided by a specific entry.
An example of this is bluez where you could end up in a situation where
for example:
NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime libasound-module-bluez (bluez4, bluez5)
NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match libasound-module-bluez
NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime bluez-hcidump (bluez-hcidump, bluez5)
NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match bluez-hcidump
The only option here is to set something like PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez4 = "bluez4"
which is clearly not very informative.
I've actually held off adding RPROVIDER support for a long while as this
does have sigificant potential for misuse. It doesn't for example allow
multiple runtime providers of the same name to coexist, that simply isn't
supported. It therefore doesn't replace some of the name mappings such
as busybox verses coreutils that OE-Core faces as that is a different
problem with different constraints. This mechanism is simply to provide
bitbake with a hint to decide what the dependency tree should look like.
Also, this allows us to stop printing a confusing message telling the user
to set PREFERRED_PROVIDER when the setting needed would be rather ambiguous.
[YOCTO #5044]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
---
lib/bb/providers.py | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
lib/bb/ui/knotty.py | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/bb/providers.py b/lib/bb/providers.py
index 8195d62..563a091 100644
--- a/lib/bb/providers.py
+++ b/lib/bb/providers.py
@@ -317,32 +317,50 @@ def filterProvidersRunTime(providers, item, cfgData, dataCache):
eligible = _filterProviders(providers, item, cfgData, dataCache)
- # Should use dataCache.preferred here?
- preferred = []
- preferred_vars = []
- pns = {}
- for p in eligible:
- pns[dataCache.pkg_fn[p]] = p
- for p in eligible:
- pn = dataCache.pkg_fn[p]
- provides = dataCache.pn_provides[pn]
- for provide in provides:
- prefervar = cfgData.getVar('PREFERRED_PROVIDER_%s' % provide, True)
- #logger.debug(1, "checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_%s (value %s) against %s", provide, prefervar, pns.keys())
- if prefervar in pns and pns[prefervar] not in preferred:
- var = "PREFERRED_PROVIDER_%s = %s" % (provide, prefervar)
- logger.verbose("selecting %s to satisfy runtime %s due to %s", prefervar, item, var)
- preferred_vars.append(var)
- pref = pns[prefervar]
- eligible.remove(pref)
- eligible = [pref] + eligible
- preferred.append(pref)
+ # First try and match any PREFERRED_RPROVIDER entry
+ prefervar = cfgData.getVar('PREFERRED_RPROVIDER_%s' % item, True)
+ foundUnique = False
+ if prefervar:
+ for p in eligible:
+ pn = dataCache.pkg_fn[p]
+ if prefervar == pn:
+ logger.verbose("selecting %s to satisfy %s due to PREFERRED_RPROVIDER", pn, item)
+ eligible.remove(p)
+ eligible = [p] + eligible
+ foundUnique = True
+ numberPreferred = 1
break
- numberPreferred = len(preferred)
+ # If we didn't find an RPROVIDER entry, try and infer the provider from PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries
+ # by looking through the provides of each eligible recipe and seeing if a PREFERRED_PROVIDER was set.
+ # This is most useful for virtual/ entries rather than having a RPROVIDER per entry.
+ if not foundUnique:
+ # Should use dataCache.preferred here?
+ preferred = []
+ preferred_vars = []
+ pns = {}
+ for p in eligible:
+ pns[dataCache.pkg_fn[p]] = p
+ for p in eligible:
+ pn = dataCache.pkg_fn[p]
+ provides = dataCache.pn_provides[pn]
+ for provide in provides:
+ prefervar = cfgData.getVar('PREFERRED_PROVIDER_%s' % provide, True)
+ #logger.debug(1, "checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_%s (value %s) against %s", provide, prefervar, pns.keys())
+ if prefervar in pns and pns[prefervar] not in preferred:
+ var = "PREFERRED_PROVIDER_%s = %s" % (provide, prefervar)
+ logger.verbose("selecting %s to satisfy runtime %s due to %s", prefervar, item, var)
+ preferred_vars.append(var)
+ pref = pns[prefervar]
+ eligible.remove(pref)
+ eligible = [pref] + eligible
+ preferred.append(pref)
+ break
+
+ numberPreferred = len(preferred)
if numberPreferred > 1:
- logger.error("Trying to resolve runtime dependency %s resulted in conflicting PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries being found.\nThe providers found were: %s\nThe PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries resulting in this conflict were: %s", item, preferred, preferred_vars)
+ logger.error("Trying to resolve runtime dependency %s resulted in conflicting PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries being found.\nThe providers found were: %s\nThe PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries resulting in this conflict were: %s. You could set PREFERRED_RPROVIDER_%s" % (item, preferred, preferred_vars, item))
logger.debug(1, "sorted runtime providers for %s are: %s", item, eligible)
diff --git a/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py b/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
index 2fc20cf..2685627 100644
--- a/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
+++ b/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
@@ -453,7 +453,10 @@ def main(server, eventHandler, params, tf = TerminalFilter):
logger.info("multiple providers are available for %s%s (%s)", event._is_runtime and "runtime " or "",
event._item,
", ".join(event._candidates))
- logger.info("consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match %s", event._item)
+ rtime = ""
+ if event._is_runtime:
+ rtime = "R"
+ logger.info("consider defining a PREFERRED_%sPROVIDER entry to match %s" % (rtime, event._item))
continue
if isinstance(event, bb.event.NoProvider):
if event._runtime:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
More information about the Openembedded-commits
mailing list