[oe-commits] [openembedded-core] 11/34: binutils: Secuirty fix CVE-2017-8396 and CVE-2017-8397

[git at git.openembedded.org]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

rpurdie pushed a commit to branch pyro
in repository openembedded-core.

commit 006d106c81420ab53a9755f96edb58c227850587
Author: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Nov 26 12:52:56 2017 -0800

    binutils: Secuirty fix CVE-2017-8396 and CVE-2017-8397
    
    Affects: <= 2.28
    
    Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.28.inc   |   1 +
 .../binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-8396_8397.patch     | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.28.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.28.inc
index 8c91f4c..ca78a30 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.28.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.28.inc
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
      file://CVE-2017-8393.patch \
      file://CVE-2017-8394.patch \
      file://CVE-2017-8395.patch \
+     file://CVE-2017-8396_8397.patch \
 "
 S  = "${WORKDIR}/git"
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-8396_8397.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-8396_8397.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..14f4282
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-8396_8397.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+From a941291cab71b9ac356e1c03968c177c03e602ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:48:16 +0930
+Subject: [PATCH] PR21432, buffer overflow in perform_relocation
+
+The existing reloc offset range tests didn't catch small negative
+offsets less than the size of the reloc field.
+
+	PR 21432
+	* reloc.c (reloc_offset_in_range): New function.
+	(bfd_perform_relocation, bfd_install_relocation): Use it.
+	(_bfd_final_link_relocate): Likewise.
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+CVE: CVE-2017-8396
+CVE: CVE-2017-8397
+Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster at mvista.com>
+
+---
+ bfd/ChangeLog |  7 +++++++
+ bfd/reloc.c   | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
+ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
+
+Index: git/bfd/reloc.c
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/bfd/reloc.c
++++ git/bfd/reloc.c
+@@ -538,6 +538,22 @@ bfd_check_overflow (enum complain_overfl
+   return flag;
+ }
+ 
++/* HOWTO describes a relocation, at offset OCTET.  Return whether the
++   relocation field is within SECTION of ABFD.  */
++
++static bfd_boolean
++reloc_offset_in_range (reloc_howto_type *howto, bfd *abfd,
++		       asection *section, bfd_size_type octet)
++{
++  bfd_size_type octet_end = bfd_get_section_limit_octets (abfd, section);
++  bfd_size_type reloc_size = bfd_get_reloc_size (howto);
++
++  /* The reloc field must be contained entirely within the section.
++     Allow zero length fields (marker relocs or NONE relocs where no
++     relocation will be performed) at the end of the section.  */
++  return octet <= octet_end && octet + reloc_size <= octet_end;
++}
++
+ /*
+ FUNCTION
+ 	bfd_perform_relocation
+@@ -618,13 +634,10 @@ bfd_perform_relocation (bfd *abfd,
+   /* PR 17512: file: 0f67f69d.  */
+   if (howto == NULL)
+     return bfd_reloc_undefined;
+-
+-  /* Is the address of the relocation really within the section?
+-     Include the size of the reloc in the test for out of range addresses.
+-     PR 17512: file: c146ab8b, 46dff27f, 38e53ebf.  */
++  
++  /* Is the address of the relocation really within the section?  */
+   octets = reloc_entry->address * bfd_octets_per_byte (abfd);
+-  if (octets + bfd_get_reloc_size (howto)
+-      > bfd_get_section_limit_octets (abfd, input_section))
++  if (!reloc_offset_in_range (howto, abfd, input_section, octets))
+     return bfd_reloc_outofrange;
+ 
+   /* Work out which section the relocation is targeted at and the
+@@ -1012,8 +1025,7 @@ bfd_install_relocation (bfd *abfd,
+ 
+   /* Is the address of the relocation really within the section?  */
+   octets = reloc_entry->address * bfd_octets_per_byte (abfd);
+-  if (octets + bfd_get_reloc_size (howto)
+-      > bfd_get_section_limit_octets (abfd, input_section))
++  if (!reloc_offset_in_range (howto, abfd, input_section, octets))
+     return bfd_reloc_outofrange;
+ 
+   /* Work out which section the relocation is targeted at and the
+@@ -1351,8 +1363,7 @@ _bfd_final_link_relocate (reloc_howto_ty
+   bfd_size_type octets = address * bfd_octets_per_byte (input_bfd);
+ 
+   /* Sanity check the address.  */
+-  if (octets + bfd_get_reloc_size (howto)
+-      > bfd_get_section_limit_octets (input_bfd, input_section))
++  if (!reloc_offset_in_range (howto, input_bfd, input_section, octets))
+     return bfd_reloc_outofrange;
+ 
+   /* This function assumes that we are dealing with a basic relocation
+Index: git/bfd/ChangeLog
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/bfd/ChangeLog
++++ git/bfd/ChangeLog
+@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
++2017-04-29  Alan Modra  <amodra at gmail.com>
++
++       PR 21432
++       * reloc.c (reloc_offset_in_range): New function.
++       (bfd_perform_relocation, bfd_install_relocation): Use it.
++       (_bfd_final_link_relocate): Likewise.
++
+ 2017-04-26  Nick Clifton  <nickc at redhat.com>
+ 
+        PR binutils/21431

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.