[oe-commits] [openembedded-core] 43/53: shadow: CVE-2018-7169

git at git.openembedded.org git at git.openembedded.org
Wed Aug 29 14:25:03 UTC 2018


This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

rpurdie pushed a commit to branch sumo
in repository openembedded-core.

commit a875522540372a4fa6658885692e564dfd729f54
Author: Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <jkrishnanjanappa at mvista.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 22 17:11:48 2018 +0530

    shadow: CVE-2018-7169
    
    newgidmap: enforce setgroups=deny if self-mapping a group
    
    This is necessary to match the kernel-side policy of "self-mapping in a
    user namespace is fine, but you cannot drop groups" -- a policy that was
    created in order to stop user namespaces from allowing trivial privilege
    escalation by dropping supplementary groups that were "blacklisted" from
    certain paths.
    
    This is the simplest fix for the underlying issue, and effectively makes
    it so that unless a user has a valid mapping set in /etc/subgid (which
    only administrators can modify) -- and they are currently trying to use
    that mapping -- then /proc/$pid/setgroups will be set to deny. This
    workaround is only partial, because ideally it should be possible to set
    an "allow_setgroups" or "deny_setgroups" flag in /etc/subgid to allow
    administrators to further restrict newgidmap(1).
    
    We also don't write anything in the "allow" case because "allow" is the
    default, and users may have already written "deny" even if they
    technically are allowed to use setgroups. And we don't write anything if
    the setgroups policy is already "deny".
    
    Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1729357
    Fixes: CVE-2018-7169
    
    Affects shadow <= 4.5
    
    Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <jkrishnanjanappa at mvista.com>
    Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
---
 .../shadow/files/CVE-2018-7169.patch               | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc            |   1 +
 2 files changed, 187 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/CVE-2018-7169.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/CVE-2018-7169.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..36887d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/CVE-2018-7169.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+From fb28c99b8a66ff2605c5cb96abc0a4d975f92de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai at suse.de>
+Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 23:49:40 +1100
+Subject: [PATCH] newgidmap: enforce setgroups=deny if self-mapping a group
+
+This is necessary to match the kernel-side policy of "self-mapping in a
+user namespace is fine, but you cannot drop groups" -- a policy that was
+created in order to stop user namespaces from allowing trivial privilege
+escalation by dropping supplementary groups that were "blacklisted" from
+certain paths.
+
+This is the simplest fix for the underlying issue, and effectively makes
+it so that unless a user has a valid mapping set in /etc/subgid (which
+only administrators can modify) -- and they are currently trying to use
+that mapping -- then /proc/$pid/setgroups will be set to deny. This
+workaround is only partial, because ideally it should be possible to set
+an "allow_setgroups" or "deny_setgroups" flag in /etc/subgid to allow
+administrators to further restrict newgidmap(1).
+
+We also don't write anything in the "allow" case because "allow" is the
+default, and users may have already written "deny" even if they
+technically are allowed to use setgroups. And we don't write anything if
+the setgroups policy is already "deny".
+
+Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1729357
+Fixes: CVE-2018-7169
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/commit/fb28c99b8a66ff2605c5cb96abc0a4d975f92de0]
+Reported-by: Craig Furman <craig.furman89 at gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai at suse.de>
+Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <jkrishnanjanappa at mvista.com>
+---
+ src/newgidmap.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
+ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/newgidmap.c b/src/newgidmap.c
+index b1e33513..59a2e75c 100644
+--- a/src/newgidmap.c
++++ b/src/newgidmap.c
+@@ -46,32 +46,37 @@
+  */
+ const char *Prog;
+ 
+-static bool verify_range(struct passwd *pw, struct map_range *range)
++
++static bool verify_range(struct passwd *pw, struct map_range *range, bool *allow_setgroups)
+ {
+ 	/* An empty range is invalid */
+ 	if (range->count == 0)
+ 		return false;
+ 
+-	/* Test /etc/subgid */
+-	if (have_sub_gids(pw->pw_name, range->lower, range->count))
++	/* Test /etc/subgid. If the mapping is valid then we allow setgroups. */
++	if (have_sub_gids(pw->pw_name, range->lower, range->count)) {
++		*allow_setgroups = true;
+ 		return true;
++	}
+ 
+-	/* Allow a process to map it's own gid */
+-	if ((range->count == 1) && (pw->pw_gid == range->lower))
++	/* Allow a process to map its own gid. */
++	if ((range->count == 1) && (pw->pw_gid == range->lower)) {
++		/* noop -- if setgroups is enabled already we won't disable it. */
+ 		return true;
++	}
+ 
+ 	return false;
+ }
+ 
+ static void verify_ranges(struct passwd *pw, int ranges,
+-	struct map_range *mappings)
++	struct map_range *mappings, bool *allow_setgroups)
+ {
+ 	struct map_range *mapping;
+ 	int idx;
+ 
+ 	mapping = mappings;
+ 	for (idx = 0; idx < ranges; idx++, mapping++) {
+-		if (!verify_range(pw, mapping)) {
++		if (!verify_range(pw, mapping, allow_setgroups)) {
+ 			fprintf(stderr, _( "%s: gid range [%lu-%lu) -> [%lu-%lu) not allowed\n"),
+ 				Prog,
+ 				mapping->upper,
+@@ -89,6 +94,70 @@ static void usage(void)
+ 	exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+ 
++void write_setgroups(int proc_dir_fd, bool allow_setgroups)
++{
++	int setgroups_fd;
++	char *policy, policy_buffer[4096];
++
++	/*
++	 * Default is "deny", and any "allow" will out-rank a "deny". We don't
++	 * forcefully write an "allow" here because the process we are writing
++	 * mappings for may have already set themselves to "deny" (and "allow"
++	 * is the default anyway). So allow_setgroups == true is a noop.
++	 */
++	policy = "deny\n";
++	if (allow_setgroups)
++		return;
++
++	setgroups_fd = openat(proc_dir_fd, "setgroups", O_RDWR|O_CLOEXEC);
++	if (setgroups_fd < 0) {
++		/*
++		 * If it's an ENOENT then we are on too old a kernel for the setgroups
++		 * code to exist. Emit a warning and bail on this.
++		 */
++		if (ENOENT == errno) {
++			fprintf(stderr, _("%s: kernel doesn't support setgroups restrictions\n"), Prog);
++			goto out;
++		}
++		fprintf(stderr, _("%s: couldn't open process setgroups: %s\n"),
++			Prog,
++			strerror(errno));
++		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++	}
++
++	/*
++	 * Check whether the policy is already what we want. /proc/self/setgroups
++	 * is write-once, so attempting to write after it's already written to will
++	 * fail.
++	 */
++	if (read(setgroups_fd, policy_buffer, sizeof(policy_buffer)) < 0) {
++		fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to read setgroups: %s\n"),
++			Prog,
++			strerror(errno));
++		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++	}
++	if (!strncmp(policy_buffer, policy, strlen(policy)))
++		goto out;
++
++	/* Write the policy. */
++	if (lseek(setgroups_fd, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
++		fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to seek setgroups: %s\n"),
++			Prog,
++			strerror(errno));
++		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++	}
++	if (dprintf(setgroups_fd, "%s", policy) < 0) {
++		fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to setgroups %s policy: %s\n"),
++			Prog,
++			policy,
++			strerror(errno));
++		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++	}
++
++out:
++	close(setgroups_fd);
++}
++
+ /*
+  * newgidmap - Set the gid_map for the specified process
+  */
+@@ -103,6 +172,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
+ 	struct stat st;
+ 	struct passwd *pw;
+ 	int written;
++	bool allow_setgroups = false;
+ 
+ 	Prog = Basename (argv[0]);
+ 
+@@ -145,7 +215,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
+ 				(unsigned long) getuid ()));
+ 		return EXIT_FAILURE;
+ 	}
+-	
++
+ 	/* Get the effective uid and effective gid of the target process */
+ 	if (fstat(proc_dir_fd, &st) < 0) {
+ 		fprintf(stderr, _("%s: Could not stat directory for target %u\n"),
+@@ -177,8 +247,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
+ 	if (!mappings)
+ 		usage();
+ 
+-	verify_ranges(pw, ranges, mappings);
++	verify_ranges(pw, ranges, mappings, &allow_setgroups);
+ 
++	write_setgroups(proc_dir_fd, allow_setgroups);
+ 	write_mapping(proc_dir_fd, ranges, mappings, "gid_map");
+ 	sub_gid_close();
+ 
+-- 
+2.13.3
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
index 6efe4a9..9691c38 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ SRC_URI = "https://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/${BP}.tar.xz \
            file://0001-shadow-CVE-2017-12424 \
            file://CVE-2017-2616.patch \
            ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'pam', '${PAM_SRC_URI}', '', d)} \
+           file://CVE-2018-7169.patch \
            "
 
 SRC_URI_append_class-target = " \

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.


More information about the Openembedded-commits mailing list