[oe-commits] [openembedded-core] 09/12: glibc: Upgrade to latest on 2.26 release
git at git.openembedded.org
git at git.openembedded.org
Thu Jan 4 11:17:22 UTC 2018
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rpurdie pushed a commit to branch master-next
in repository openembedded-core.
commit 6d28af6e55ee5cc88294878809ec97ba336269fa
Author: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Tue Nov 14 19:02:09 2017 -0800
glibc: Upgrade to latest on 2.26 release
For detailed view of changes see
https://github.com/kraj/glibc/compare/glibc-2.26...77f921dac17c5fa99bd9e926d926c327982895f7
Drop two upstreamed patches
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
---
...ress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch | 90 ----------
...pport-types-without-operator-int-BZ-21972.patch | 194 ---------------------
meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.26.bb | 4 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 287 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-assert-Suppress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-assert-Suppress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index b2bb96b..0000000
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-assert-Suppress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-From 037283cbc74739b72f36dfec827d120faa243406 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:50:55 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 26/26] assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement
- expression [BZ# 21242]
-
-On 07/05/2017 10:15 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
-> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote:
->> On 07/05/2017 05:46 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
->>> A problem occurs to me: expressions involving VLAs _are_ evaluated
->>> inside sizeof.
->>
->> The type of the sizeof argument would still be int (due to the
->> comparison against 0), so this doesn't actually occur.
->
-> I rechecked what C99 says about sizeof and VLAs, and you're right -
-> the operand of sizeof is only evaluated when sizeof is _directly_
-> applied to a VLA. So this is indeed safe, but I think this wrinkle
-> should be mentioned in the comment. Perhaps
->
-> /* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
-> but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
-> for the second occurrence. The explicit comparison against zero
-> ensures that sizeof is not directly applied to a function pointer or
-> bit-field (which would be ill-formed) or VLA (which would be evaluated). */
->
-> zw
-
-What about the attached patch?
-
-Siddhesh, is this okay during the freeze? I'd like to backport it to
-2.25 as well.
-
-Thanks,
-Florian
-
-assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement expression
-
-2017-07-06 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com>
-
- [BZ #21242]
- * assert/assert.h [__GNUC__ && !__STRICT_ANSI__] (assert):
- Suppress pedantic warning resulting from statement expression.
- (__ASSERT_FUNCTION): Add missing __extendsion__.
----
-
-Upstream-Status: Submitted
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
-
- assert/assert.h | 12 +++++++++---
- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/assert/assert.h b/assert/assert.h
-index 22f019537c..6801cfeb10 100644
---- a/assert/assert.h
-+++ b/assert/assert.h
-@@ -91,13 +91,19 @@ __END_DECLS
- ? __ASSERT_VOID_CAST (0) \
- : __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION))
- # else
-+/* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
-+ but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
-+ for the second occurrence. The explicit comparison against zero is
-+ required to support function pointers and bit fields in this
-+ context, and to suppress the evaluation of variable length
-+ arrays. */
- # define assert(expr) \
-- ({ \
-+ ((void) sizeof ((expr) == 0), __extension__ ({ \
- if (expr) \
- ; /* empty */ \
- else \
- __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION); \
-- })
-+ }))
- # endif
-
- # ifdef __USE_GNU
-@@ -113,7 +119,7 @@ __END_DECLS
- C9x has a similar variable called __func__, but prefer the GCC one since
- it demangles C++ function names. */
- # if defined __cplusplus ? __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 6) : __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 4)
--# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
-+# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __extension__ __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
- # else
- # if defined __STDC_VERSION__ && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L
- # define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __func__
---
-2.13.3
-
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0029-assert-Support-types-without-operator-int-BZ-21972.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0029-assert-Support-types-without-operator-int-BZ-21972.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 3c7050f..0000000
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0029-assert-Support-types-without-operator-int-BZ-21972.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-
-* fixes "lambda-expression in unevaluated context" compile failures such as
- https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/705
-
-* fixes "no match for 'operator==" compile failures such as
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482990
-
-* Changelog edit was removed from upstream commit because it caused conflict
-
-Signed-off-by: S. Lockwood-Childs <sjl at vctlabs.com>
-
-From b5889d25e9bf944a89fdd7bcabf3b6c6f6bb6f7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com>
-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:03:29 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] assert: Support types without operator== (int) [BZ #21972]
-
----
- assert/Makefile | 11 ++++++-
- assert/assert.h | 16 ++++++----
- assert/tst-assert-c++.cc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- assert/tst-assert-g++.cc | 19 ++++++++++++
- 4 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
- create mode 100644 assert/tst-assert-c++.cc
- create mode 100644 assert/tst-assert-g++.cc
-
-diff --git a/assert/Makefile b/assert/Makefile
-index 1c3be9b..9ec1be8 100644
---- a/assert/Makefile
-+++ b/assert/Makefile
-@@ -25,6 +25,15 @@ include ../Makeconfig
- headers := assert.h
-
- routines := assert assert-perr __assert
--tests := test-assert test-assert-perr
-+tests := test-assert test-assert-perr tst-assert-c++ tst-assert-g++
-
- include ../Rules
-+
-+ifeq ($(have-cxx-thread_local),yes)
-+CFLAGS-tst-assert-c++.o = -std=c++11
-+LDLIBS-tst-assert-c++ = -lstdc++
-+CFLAGS-tst-assert-g++.o = -std=gnu++11
-+LDLIBS-tst-assert-g++ = -lstdc++
-+else
-+tests-unsupported += tst-assert-c++ tst-assert-g++
-+endif
-diff --git a/assert/assert.h b/assert/assert.h
-index 6801cfe..640c95c 100644
---- a/assert/assert.h
-+++ b/assert/assert.h
-@@ -85,7 +85,12 @@ __END_DECLS
- /* When possible, define assert so that it does not add extra
- parentheses around EXPR. Otherwise, those added parentheses would
- suppress warnings we'd expect to be detected by gcc's -Wparentheses. */
--# if !defined __GNUC__ || defined __STRICT_ANSI__
-+# if defined __cplusplus
-+# define assert(expr) \
-+ (static_cast <bool> (expr) \
-+ ? void (0) \
-+ : __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION))
-+# elif !defined __GNUC__ || defined __STRICT_ANSI__
- # define assert(expr) \
- ((expr) \
- ? __ASSERT_VOID_CAST (0) \
-@@ -93,12 +98,11 @@ __END_DECLS
- # else
- /* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
- but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
-- for the second occurrence. The explicit comparison against zero is
-- required to support function pointers and bit fields in this
-- context, and to suppress the evaluation of variable length
-- arrays. */
-+ for the second occurrence. The ternary operator is required to
-+ support function pointers and bit fields in this context, and to
-+ suppress the evaluation of variable length arrays. */
- # define assert(expr) \
-- ((void) sizeof ((expr) == 0), __extension__ ({ \
-+ ((void) sizeof ((expr) ? 1 : 0), __extension__ ({ \
- if (expr) \
- ; /* empty */ \
- else \
-diff --git a/assert/tst-assert-c++.cc b/assert/tst-assert-c++.cc
-new file mode 100644
-index 0000000..12a5e69
---- /dev/null
-+++ b/assert/tst-assert-c++.cc
-@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
-+/* Tests for interactions between C++ and assert.
-+ Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+ This file is part of the GNU C Library.
-+
-+ The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
-+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
-+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
-+ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
-+
-+ The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
-+ Lesser General Public License for more details.
-+
-+ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
-+ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
-+ <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
-+
-+#include <assert.h>
-+
-+/* The C++ standard requires that if the assert argument is a constant
-+ subexpression, then the assert itself is one, too. */
-+constexpr int
-+check_constexpr ()
-+{
-+ return (assert (true), 1);
-+}
-+
-+/* Objects of this class can be contextually converted to bool, but
-+ cannot be compared to int. */
-+struct no_int
-+{
-+ no_int () = default;
-+ no_int (const no_int &) = delete;
-+
-+ explicit operator bool () const
-+ {
-+ return true;
-+ }
-+
-+ bool operator! () const; /* No definition. */
-+ template <class T> bool operator== (T) const; /* No definition. */
-+ template <class T> bool operator!= (T) const; /* No definition. */
-+};
-+
-+/* This class tests that operator== is not used by assert. */
-+struct bool_and_int
-+{
-+ bool_and_int () = default;
-+ bool_and_int (const no_int &) = delete;
-+
-+ explicit operator bool () const
-+ {
-+ return true;
-+ }
-+
-+ bool operator! () const; /* No definition. */
-+ template <class T> bool operator== (T) const; /* No definition. */
-+ template <class T> bool operator!= (T) const; /* No definition. */
-+};
-+
-+static int
-+do_test ()
-+{
-+ {
-+ no_int value;
-+ assert (value);
-+ }
-+
-+ {
-+ bool_and_int value;
-+ assert (value);
-+ }
-+
-+ return 0;
-+}
-+
-+#include <support/test-driver.c>
-diff --git a/assert/tst-assert-g++.cc b/assert/tst-assert-g++.cc
-new file mode 100644
-index 0000000..8c06402
---- /dev/null
-+++ b/assert/tst-assert-g++.cc
-@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
-+/* Tests for interactions between C++ and assert. GNU C++11 version.
-+ Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+ This file is part of the GNU C Library.
-+
-+ The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
-+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
-+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
-+ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
-+
-+ The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
-+ Lesser General Public License for more details.
-+
-+ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
-+ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
-+ <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
-+
-+#include <tst-assert-c++.cc>
---
-1.9.4
-
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.26.bb b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.26.bb
index 7dd025a..5213a6a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.26.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.26.bb
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSES;md5=e9a558e243b36d3209f380deb394b213 \
DEPENDS += "gperf-native"
-SRCREV ?= "1c9a5c270d8b66f30dcfaf1cb2d6cf39d3e18369"
+SRCREV ?= "77f921dac17c5fa99bd9e926d926c327982895f7"
SRCBRANCH ?= "release/${PV}/master"
@@ -40,10 +40,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc \
file://0023-Define-DUMMY_LOCALE_T-if-not-defined.patch \
file://0024-elf-dl-deps.c-Make-_dl_build_local_scope-breadth-fir.patch \
file://0025-locale-fix-hard-coded-reference-to-gcc-E.patch \
- file://0026-assert-Suppress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch \
file://0027-glibc-reset-dl-load-write-lock-after-forking.patch \
file://0028-Bug-4578-add-ld.so-lock-while-fork.patch \
- file://0029-assert-Support-types-without-operator-int-BZ-21972.patch \
"
NATIVESDKFIXES ?= ""
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
More information about the Openembedded-commits
mailing list