[OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] mesa: upgrade to 7.10.2

Saul Wold sgw at linux.intel.com
Sat Apr 16 05:06:19 UTC 2011


On 04/15/2011 09:38 PM, Yu Ke wrote:
> On 2011/4/16 0:42, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 04/14/2011 10:44 PM, Yu Ke wrote:
>>> From: Yu Ke<ke.yu at intel.com>
>>>
>>> - also remove the talloc-removal.patch because it is already
>>> included in this version
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke<ke.yu at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../distro/include/preferred-xorg-versions.inc | 2 +-
>>> .../mesa/files/talloc-removal.patch |15571 --------------------
>>> .../mesa/{mesa-dri_7.10.bb => mesa-dri_7.10.2.bb} | 7 +-
>>> .../{mesa-xlib_7.10.bb => mesa-xlib_7.10.2.bb} | 7 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15580 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/files/talloc-removal.patch
>>> rename meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/{mesa-dri_7.10.bb =>
>>> mesa-dri_7.10.2.bb} (85%)
>>> rename meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/{mesa-xlib_7.10.bb =>
>>> mesa-xlib_7.10.2.bb} (68%)
>>>
>> Ke,
>>
>> I noticed other patches for both the 7.10.2 version and GIT version in
>> the mesa-dri directory. Also is there a reason we are carrying around
>> older versions of mesa-dri?
>>
>> I am looking at the overall clean state of things as we move forward.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sau!
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. Yes, I will add Upstream-Status tag to those
> patches. The old versions 7.8.2 is kept for GPLv3 talloc workaround, The
> other old 7.5 and 7.7 version is just legacy recipe from poky. These old
> recipes can be removed safely. I will make patch to remove it.
>
> BTW, I notice this mesa upgrade patch is already in your staging branch
> (http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=distro/stage),
> so should I make a incremental patch base on this, or make a V3 mesa
> upgrade patch base on master branch?
>
Ke,

Yes, I have been testing what I have currently, so an incremental patch 
would be better at this point.

Sau!
> Regards
> Ke




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list