[OE-core] [RFC] Working toward a GNOME layer
Joshua Lock
josh at linux.intel.com
Fri Apr 22 16:25:11 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 20:23 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:40 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:05 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Thursday 21 April 2011 15:02:49 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > > and possibly more. I would like to create a meta-gnome layer in the
> > > > meta-openembedded repository where new recipes get added and things from
> > > > meta-demoapps can get moved over into. Long term recipes-gnome in oe-core
> > > > should move there as well.
> > > >
> > > > What are your thoughts on this?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > >
> > > From my perspective this sounds like a great idea. The only question would be
> > > how much of the "GNOME" libs would remain in oe-core as some of them are quite
> > > widely used outside of GNOME proper; however that can easily be worked out as
> > > these things mature.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > My personal opinion would be that we start with glib & gtk+ (plus their
> > dependencies, i.e. pango, atk, etc) in core and move the rest out to a
> > layer.
>
> Do we move out sato as well?
>
> > I feel that Gtk+ is used by enough non-gnome software that it belongs in
> > core but others may disagree?
>
> I think it needs to be in the core as we need something there to test
> X/graphics and so forth. This implies we need sato and its dependencies
> there too though (which are thankfully minimal by design).
I don't disagree with the need for a GUI in the core, my only concern is
that we'll have old/deprecated libraries in oe-core unless we find some
time to update Sato a bit.
Note: this is still on my To Do but isn't as high a priority as I might
like.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Build System Monkey
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list