[OE-core] [PATCH v2] arch-armv7a.inc: fix armv7a-vfp-neon -> armv7a compat case

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 15:41 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Without this 'armv7a' is used as TUNE_ARCH but does *not* end up in PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS:
> 
> arch all 1
> arch any 6
> arch noarch 11
> arch arm 16
> arch armv4 21
> arch armv4t 26
> arch armv5 31
> arch armv5t 36
> arch armv5-vfp 41
> arch armv5t-vfp 46
> arch armv5e 51
> arch armv5te 56
> arch armv5e-vfp 61
> arch armv5te-vfp 66
> arch armv6-vfp 71
> arch armv6t-vfp 76
> arch armv7-vfp 81
> arch armv7t2-vfp 86
> arch armv7a-vfp 91
> arch armv7at2-vfp 96
> arch armv7a-vfp-neon 101
> arch armv7at2-vfp-neon 106
> arch beagleboard 111
> 
> Which leads to a failing do_rootfs
> 
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
> ---
>  meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
> index ce9cee5..704f86b 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
> @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv7a ?= "armv7a vfp"
>  TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv7at ?= "armv7a vfp thumb"
>  TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv7a-neon ?= "armv7a vfp neon"
>  TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv7at-neon ?= "armv7a vfp neon thumb"
> -PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7a = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7} armv7a-vfp"
> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7a = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7} armv7a armv7a-vfp"
>  PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7a-neon = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7a} armv7a-vfp-neon"
> -PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7at = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7t} armv7a-vfp armv7at2-vfp"
> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7at = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7t} armv7a armv7a-vfp armv7at2-vfp"
>  PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7at-neon = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv7at} armv7a-vfp-neon armv7at2-vfp-neon"

I didn't spell it out but you still need the b versions too for the
equivalent lines ;-)

Cheers,

Richard