[OE-core] [PATCH 22/22] feature-arm-thumb: Take ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET into account to decide thumb mode

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 17:46:29 UTC 2011


On (01/08/11 14:14), Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 00:36 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > From: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> > 
> > This will decouple the compiling in thumb mode from having thumb
> > capable cores.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc |    6 ++++--
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc
> > index e7d392e..533eab9 100644
> > --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc
> > +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc
> > @@ -4,9 +4,11 @@
> >  # encoded RISC sub-set. Thumb code is smaller (maybe 70% of the ARM size)
> >  # but requires more instructions (140% for 70% smaller code) so may be
> >  # slower.
> > -TUNEVALID[thumb] = "Use thumb instructions instead of ARM"
> > -ARM_THUMB_M_OPT = "${@['-mno-thumb', '-mthumb'][bb.data.getVar('ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET', d, 1) == 'thumb']}"
> > +TUNEVALID[thumb] = "Use thumb instructions instead of ARM if ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET != arm"
> > +ARM_THUMB_M_OPT = "${@['-mthumb', '-mno-thumb'][bb.data.getVar('ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET', d, 1) != 'arm']}"
> >  TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "thumb", "${ARM_THUMB_M_OPT}", "${ARM_THUMB_M_OPT}", d)}"
> > +
> > +TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "thumb", "-mthumb", "-mno-thumb", d)}"
> >  OVERRIDES .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "thumb", ":thumb", "", d)}"
> >  
> >  # Note armv7 will hit on armv7a as well

this patch was wrong anyway. The one from Martin was better which was
pushed to help arm builds going.

> 
> The original change committed into master in my absence is broken.i

This commit is what was pushed e23f9ce928353c9da2b9c4bfa9a1a125a7d160f2
how is it broken ?

> patch is just making things even worse and more broken :(
> 
> I suspect what people really wanted was:
> 
> TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "thumb", "${ARM_THUMB_M_OPT}", "-mno-thumb", d)}"
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
-Khem




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list