[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ghostscript: fix parallel build issue

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 11:20 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 05:34:45 PM Kang Kai wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Kang Kai<kai.kang at windriver.com>
>>>
>>> ghostscript fails some time on autobuilder, it seems a parallel build
>>> issue.
>>> Add patch to fix it.
>>>
>>> Fixes [Yocto #1202]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kang Kai<kai.kang at windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../ghostscript-9.02-parallel-make.patch           |   17
>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>> .../ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02.bb                |    3 ++-
>>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644
>>>
>>> meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.02-parallel-mak
>>> e.patch
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>>
>>> a/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.02-parallel-m
>>> ake.patch
>>>
>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.02-parallel-m
>>> ake.patch new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..76d1676
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++
>>>
>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.02-parallel-m
>>> ake.patch @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>>> +When parallel make it will fail with multi copy, see
>>> +http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202
>>> +
>>> +Upstream-Status: Pending
>>> +
>>> +Signed-off-by: Kang Kai<kai.kang at windriver.com>
>>> +--- ghostscript-9.02/base/unixhead.mak.orig    2011-07-27
>>> 17:06:17.749456100
>>> +0800 ++++ ghostscript-9.02/base/unixhead.mak   2011-07-27
>>> 17:06:37.449456100
>>> +0800 +@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
>>> +
>>> + # Define generic commands.
>>> +
>>> +-CP_=cp
>>> ++CP_=cp -f
>>
>> It means it will first delete the target if it exists. Did you check if
>> this
>> is correct behavior ?
>>
> Khem,
>
> As far as I know the file is that is being copied to is the same file and
> the CP is only used in that case, the 2 files are copied to the same
> location due to the Parallel make.

if thats the case then probably checking for existence of file before
copying it over
might be one approach