[OE-core] [PATCH 10/10] local.conf.sample: make BBMASK assignment weak

[Kamble, Nitin A]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Tom Rini
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:53 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 10/10] local.conf.sample: make BBMASK
> assignment weak
> 
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:01 AM,  <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> >
> > So that it can be overridden by layers if needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta-
> yocto/conf/local.conf.sample
> > index 3e71b0a..4acec37 100644
> > --- a/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample
> > +++ b/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample
> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ DISTRO ?= "poky"
> >
> >  # BBMASK is a regular expression that can be used to tell BitBake to
> ignore
> >  # certain recipes.
> > -BBMASK = ""
> > +BBMASK ?= ""
> >
> >  # EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES allows extra packages to be added to the
> generated images
> >  # (Some of these are automatically added to certain image types)
> 
> In oe.dev we just dropped this from local.conf iirc since a real
> assignmnet was overriding a useful setting we provided.  IMHO, we
> should do the same here (or at least comment it out).

I agree. We should comment it out.
> 
> --
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core