[OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi tune parameters
Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kamble at intel.com
Fri Aug 5 23:25:48 UTC 2011
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Saul Wold
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:24 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
> tune parameters
>
> On 08/05/2011 11:07 AM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> >> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
> Of
> >> Richard Purdie
> >> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 9:04 AM
> >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
> >> tune parameters
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble at intel.com wrote:
> >>> From: Nitin A Kamble<nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble<nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc | 23
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>> meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc | 4 ++++
> >>> meta/conf/machine/include/tune-x86_64.inc | 2 +-
> >>> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> >> b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> >>> index 2709440..fb527da 100644
> >>> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> >>> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> >>> @@ -6,17 +6,29 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "x86"
> >>> TARGET_FPU ?= ""
> >>> X86ARCH32 ?= "i586"
> >>> X86ARCH64 ?= "x86_64"
> >>> +X86ARCHX32 ?= "x86_64"
> >>>
> >>> # ELF32 ABI
> >>> TUNEVALID[m32] = "IA32 ELF32 standard ABI"
> >>> -TUNECONFLICTS[m32] = "m64"
> >>> +TUNECONFLICTS[m32] = "m64 mx32"
> >>> TUNE_ARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m32",
> >> "${X86ARCH32}", "" ,d)}"
> >>> +ABIEXTENSION .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m32",
> "32",
> >> "" ,d)}"
> >>
> >> Please drop the above line. There is no need to change that.
> >>
> >>> TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m32", "-
> m32",
> >> "", d)}"
> >>>
> >>> +# x32 ABI
> >>> +TUNEVALID[mx32] = "IA32e (x86_64) ELF32 standard ABI"
> >>> +TUNECONFLICTS[mx32] = "m64 m32"
> >>> +TUNE_ARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32",
> >> "${X86ARCHX32}", "" ,d)}"
> >>> +ABIEXTENSION .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32",
> >> "x32", "" ,d)}"
> >>> +TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-
> >> mx32", "", d)}"
> >>> +TUNE_LDARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-m
> >> elf32_x86_64", "", d)}"
> >>> +TUNE_ASARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-
> >> x32", "", d)}"
> >>> +
> >>
> >> These are fine.
> >>
> >>> # ELF64 ABI
> >>> TUNEVALID[m64] = "IA32e (x86_64) ELF64 standard ABI"
> >>> -TUNECONFLICT[m64] = "m32"
> >>> +TUNECONFLICT[m64] = "m32 mx32"
> >>> TUNE_ARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m64",
> >> "${X86ARCH64}", "" ,d)}"
> >>> +ABIEXTENSION .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m64",
> "64",
> >> "" ,d)}"
> >>
> >> Again, please drop the above line.
> >>
> >>> TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m64", "-
> m64",
> >> "", d)}"
> >>>
> >>> TUNE_PKGARCH ?= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m32",
> "x86",
> >> "x86_64", d)}"
> >>> @@ -30,4 +42,9 @@ PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86 = "x86"
> >>> AVAILTUNES += "x86-64"
> >>> TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64 ?= "m64"
> >>> BASE_LIB_tune-x86-64 ?= "lib64"
> >>> -PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64 = "x86_64"
> >>> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64 = "x86-64"
> >>
> >> That is likely wrong, please drop this piece.
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +AVAILTUNES += "x86-64-x32"
> >>> +TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "mx32"
> >>> +BASE_LIB_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "lib"
> >>> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64-x32 = "x86-64-x32"
> >>
> >> And this is wrong too.
> >>
> >> You really want:
> >>
> >> TUNE_PKGARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-
> x32",
> >> "", d)}"
> >> PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64-x32 = "x86_64-x32"
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
> >> b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
> >>> index 25c2226..8a4de3e 100644
> >>> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
> >>> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
> >>> @@ -18,3 +18,7 @@ TUNE_FEATURES_tune-core2-64 ?=
> >> "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64} core2"
> >>> BASE_LIB_tune-core2-64 ?= "lib64"
> >>> PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-64 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-
> x86-
> >> 64} core2-64"
> >>>
> >>> +AVAILTUNES += "core2-x32"
> >>> +TUNE_FEATURES_tune-core2-x32 ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64-x32}
> >> core2"
> >>> +BASE_LIB_tune-core2-x32 ?= "lib"
> >>> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-x32 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-
> >> x86-64-x32} core2-x32"
> >>
> >> PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-x32 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-
> x86-
> >> 64-x32} core2-64-x32"
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Richard
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Richard,
> > Changed the commits according to the comments, please pull/cherry-
> pick again.
> >
> It might be best to rebase against master and resend a V2 patch set so
> it's clear to RP and other in the community what you changed.
Ok, second patch set coming soon.
>
> BTW, for the layer, do you really need to pull glibc back in? Or can
> you use eglibc from oe-core with the correct settings for x32?
I will stay with glibc in the meta-x32 for now.
Thanks,
Nitin
>
>
> Sau!
>
> > Thanks,
> > Nitin
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list