[OE-core] populate_sdk: We need to ensure that the SDK sysroot reflects PACKAGE_ARCH
Gary Thomas
gary at mlbassoc.com
Wed Aug 10 13:48:16 UTC 2011
On 2011-08-10 07:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if
>> you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures?
>> I'd like to create a simple SDK (just toolchain mostly) using 'meta-toolchain'
>> for both armv5te and armv7a and install them simultaneously on the same
>> host. My previous attempts at this fell flat as there were a number of
>> files marked as "arm" (i.e. not armv5te or arvm7a) that were common between
>> the two SDK packages, but they didn't seem to be identical.
>
> This is supposed to work but wouldn't due to the issue and the patch
> I've proposed. Whether that is the only issue I don't know.
I'll be glad to test this once you've worked it out.
>
> Can you remember which files we're talking about here?
Not right off - there were just a ton of directories with only arm in the
path that seemed to be architecture dependent. I think it's all related to
TARGET_SYS vs MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS and how/where they are used.
>
>> With these changes, will it be possible to support such sets of multiple
>> toolchains? (No, ADT is not the answer - I just want the toolchains)
>
> ADT uses meta-toolchain-* so its all related.
Fair enough, I just don't want to have to use ADT just to install a toolchain.
Thanks
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list