[OE-core] Blocker - [Bug 1070] [deb] core-image-sato-sdk.bb: do_rootfs failed: unmet dependencies
Lu, Lianhao
lianhao.lu at intel.com
Fri Aug 19 08:40:05 UTC 2011
wenzong fan wrote on 2011-08-19:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I think I was blocked by this defect now, and it also blocked the #1086:
>
> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070
>
> I have try to add the depended packages to 'package_to_install', but
> they won't be installed at all. I know a little about the dpkg, I'm
> not sure if this is caused by 'dpkg/apt-get' or something wrong in the dpkg database.
>
> Details please refer to the attached logs, any suggestions will be welcomed!
>
I'm not sure what's the difference between update-alternatives-cworth and update-alternatives-dpkg, but I do see the update-alternatives-cworth claims conflicting with update-alternatives-dpkg. It seems the former is coming from the ipk world, and the latter is coming from deb world. Should we use update-alternatives-dpkg in deb world?
Best Regards,
Lianhao
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list