[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: restoring LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.0"

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at gmail.com
Fri Aug 19 20:51:51 UTC 2011


On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 01:20 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb
>> >> index 44f1ebe..5d9871f 100644
>> >> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb
>> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb
>> >> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ KMACHINE_qemuarm  = "yocto/standard/arm-versatile-926ejs"
>> >>  KBRANCH = ${KMACHINE}
>> >>  KMETA = meta
>> >>
>> >> -LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.0.1"
>> >> +LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.0"
>> >>  LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION ?= "-yocto-${LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE}"
>> >>
>> >>  SRCREV_machine_qemuarm = "36b4cdddcafc711f0ec9ad97882f23a6443c61b2"
>> >
>> > That's going to cause PV to go backwards, right?  If you're going to do
>> > that then you probably ought to consider bumping PE to retain
>> > monotonicity.
>>
>> Indeed. I always just think of LINUX_VERSION as yet another package internal
>> variable (from non-bitbake experience), so tweaking it has no impact
>> on this sort
>> of thing.
>>
>> I can look into changing the epoch .. but not until Monday or later in
>> the weekend.
>
> I'm not 100% convinced that this is a good idea. I'd really prefer the
> kernel accurately reflected the version it was. Can we not do:
>
> PREFERRRED_VERSION_xxx = "3.0%"
>
> to get around the preferred version issues?

Both Darren and I tried variants of this but couldn't get it to match, but I can
certainly try again. This was also my first attempt when bumping the string.

But as I mentioned multiple times before, even changing the version with
sub releases is a change from how I handled it before, so from that point
of view, I never should have entered into tweaking this. :)

Bruce

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list