[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] qt4e-demo-image: Fix bug 999

[Saul Wold]

On 08/23/2011 08:10 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 23 aug. 2011, om 14:53 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tuesday 23 August 2011 13:27:11 you wrote:
>>> I would lean toward a seperate meta-qt layer, not sure if it should be
>>> hosted in the oe-core git repo, meta-oe or a completely seperate git repo.
>>
>> Possibly we should have meta-qt for Qt applications and additional libraries
>> such as Qwt (and I'm all for moving our current Qt apps there, they don't
>> really belong in OE-core IMHO). If you're suggesting moving out Qt itself
>> though, I think Qt belongs in OE-core, certainly as much as GTK+ does.
>
> I still say that gtk+ should be in it's own layer as well :) I hope to have some time in september to come up with a proposal to rearrange oe-core and meta-oe in a more logical set of layers.

Yea, we should discuss this further (post 1.1) for me, while I think 
it's important to have some demos/test with the oe-core (if we keep it 
in oe-core), I am not sure we should have all the tests there.

I would suggest possibly renaming the current meta-qt3 to meta-qt and 
including this set of demos there.

Comments?

Sau!


We already have a QT3 layer, maybe it makes sense to make that a generic 
meta-qt layer and have things reside in it.

> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>