[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] qt4e-demo-image: Fix bug 999

[Paul Eggleton]

On Thursday 25 August 2011 00:36:45 Saul Wold wrote:
> Why do we need the qt4e-base-image and this demo-image?  Do we expect to
> have multiple images?  This creates yet another image that needs to be
> built and tested?  Can this really just be added to the sato-sdk or
> lsb-sdk images instead?

No, it doesn't belong in sato-sdk and lsb-sdk is Qt4/X11 based which counts it 
out also. It really needs its own image. The -base image could be merged into 
-demo though.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre