[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 03/17] image_types.bbclass: disable cleanmarkers for jffs2 images

[Saul Wold]

From: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami at gmail.com>

* Add '-n' to suppress cleanmarker nodes since jffs2
* is usually used for NAND flash and the cleanmarkers are created in
* the OOB area by flash_eraseall -j
*
* From man pages: -n, --no-cleanmarkers
* Do not write cleanmarker nodes to the beginning of each erase block.
* This option can be useful for creating JFFS2 images for use on NAND flash,
* and for creating images which are to be used on a variety of hardware with differing eraseblock sizes.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami at gmail.com>
---
 meta/classes/image_types.bbclass |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
index bd4b7bc..489fbe1 100644
--- a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ runimagecmd () {
 XZ_COMPRESSION_LEVEL ?= "-e -9"
 XZ_INTEGRITY_CHECK ?= "crc32"
 
-IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 = "mkfs.jffs2 --root=${IMAGE_ROOTFS} --faketime --output=${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
+IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 = "mkfs.jffs2 --root=${IMAGE_ROOTFS} --faketime --output=${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 -n ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
 IMAGE_CMD_sum.jffs2 = "${IMAGE_CMD_jffs2} && sumtool -i ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.jffs2 \
-	-o ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.sum.jffs2 ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
+	-o ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.sum.jffs2 -n ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
 
 IMAGE_CMD_cramfs = "mkcramfs ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.cramfs ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
 
-- 
1.7.6.4