[OE-core] [PATCH 02/10] udev: fix LICENSE fields to be SPDX compliant
Joshua Lock
josh at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 19 18:48:52 UTC 2011
On 15/12/11 23:36, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, December 15, 2011, Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com
> <mailto:josh at linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>> Additionally I'm not sure where the LGPL license came from, the COPYING
>> file and Fedora both say GPL v2 or later so drop the LGPL entry for now.
Of course, the LGPL is for libudev!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com
> <mailto:josh at linux.intel.com>>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc | 2 +-
>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
> b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
>> index eac7903..769d54a 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "/dev/ and hotplug management daemon"
>> DESCRIPTION = "udev is a daemon which dynamically creates and removes
> device nodes from \
>> /dev/, handles hotplug events and loads drivers at boot time."
>> HOMEPAGE =
> "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev.html"
>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+"
>> +LICENSE = "GPL-2.0+"
>> LICENSE_${PN} = "GPLv2+
>
> Why two notations for Gpl v2 above
Good catch, thanks!
I'll get an updated patch series out.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list