[OE-core] [PATCH 02/10] udev: fix LICENSE fields to be SPDX compliant

Joshua Lock josh at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 19 18:48:52 UTC 2011


On 15/12/11 23:36, Khem Raj wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thursday, December 15, 2011, Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com
> <mailto:josh at linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>> Additionally I'm not sure where the LGPL license came from, the COPYING
>> file and Fedora both say GPL v2 or later so drop the LGPL entry for now.

Of course, the LGPL is for libudev!

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com
> <mailto:josh at linux.intel.com>>
>> ---
>>  meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc |    2 +-
>>  meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc     |    4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
> b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
>> index eac7903..769d54a 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc
>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "/dev/ and hotplug management daemon"
>>  DESCRIPTION = "udev is a daemon which dynamically creates and removes
> device nodes from \
>>  /dev/, handles hotplug events and loads drivers at boot time."
>>  HOMEPAGE =
> "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev.html"
>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+"
>> +LICENSE = "GPL-2.0+"
>>  LICENSE_${PN} = "GPLv2+
> 
> Why two notations for Gpl v2 above

Good catch, thanks!

I'll get an updated patch series out.

Cheers,
Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
        Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list