[OE-core] [PATCH v4 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:05 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 1 jul 2011, om 13:52 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > 
> > * Koen Kooi Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> [07/01/11 09:20 AM]:
> >> Op 1 jul 2011, om 09:06 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven:
> >>> Also remove the other kernel24 references.
> >>> Make everything dependent on kernel26 default.
> >> 
> >> Since there will be only one of each, can we just completely scrap there
> >> variables and put the items directly in the tasks?
> > 
> > Sure, we could do that.
> > 
> > One question though, how should I treat 
> > 
> > RRECOMMENDS_task-base-kernel26 = "\
> >    kernel-module-nls-utf8 \
> >    kernel-module-input \
> >    kernel-module-uinput \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-dev \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-proc \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-sysfs \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-sa1100 \
> >    kernel-module-unix"
> > 
> > from task-base.bb? Should that part just be new, general
> > RRECOMMENDS = "\
> >    kernel-module-nls-utf8 \
> >    kernel-module-input \
> >    kernel-module-uinput \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-dev \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-proc \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-sysfs \
> >    kernel-module-rtc-sa1100 \
> >    kernel-module-unix"?
> > 
> > I guess that's the right thing, and I'll create a new pull request with that 
> > merged into the last patch.
> 
> The above is what I had in mind, but I do question the need for
> rtc-sa1100 in task-base, that should be in the machine.conf as
> MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS or so. But that is outside the scope of this
> patch I guess.

Agreed, rtc-sa1100 shouldn't be there and I don't know how that
happened :/. I'll take patches to resolve that.

Cheers,

Richard