[OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Add recipes for 0.9.32 release

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 23:48 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > With this changeset we add new recipes for 0.9.32 and make that default
> >> > preference. Then the git recipe are moved to track the latest master.
> >> > systemd related fixes are separately applied to both git recipe and 0.9.32
> >> > recipes
> >> >
> >> > Both sets work for arm,mips,ppc,x86,x86-64
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > -Khem
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The following changes since commit 4eb3abaa5f4b5df0314dc0d503298d65cd203259:
> >> >
> >> >  uclibc-0.9.32: Implement execvpe and refresh scheduler functions (2011-07-05 13:53:05 -0700)
> >> >
> >> > are available in the git repository at:
> >> >  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/uclibc-0.9.32
> >> >  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/uclibc-0.9.32
> >> >
> >> > Khem Raj (5):
> >> >  uclibc: Add recipes for 0.9.32 release
> >> >  tcmode-default: Define UCLIBCVERSION and set it to 0.9.32
> >> >  uclibc_git: Move SRCREV past 0.9.32 release
> >>
> >> I have update PV in above commit to 0.9.32+0.9.33-rc0 instead of
> >> 0.9.32+gitr${SRCPV} which is troublesome to use with git
> >
> > Can you expand a little more about what was troublesome with it?
> >
> > Is there a revision being specified for the uclibc git recipe?
> 
> since its master git I have to change SRCREV frquently and if I do not bump
> PR it ends up with dependency problems while generating image since
> the SHAs are random
> and they are getting into PV sometimes opkg thinks the version is
> smaller than the previous
> one and opkg does not like it. that  aside 0.9.32+0.9.33-rc0 explains
> the recipes PV better IMO

Could you at least add the SRCREV you're using the recipe please? I
didn't look really hard but I couldn't seem to find it when I last
looked...

Cheers,

Richard