[OE-core] [PATCH 4/7] binutils: package unpackaged files

[Kamble, Nitin A]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Phil Blundell
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:34 AM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/7] binutils: package unpackaged files
> 
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > @@ -35,11 +35,13 @@ FILES_${PN}-symlinks = " \
> > >  	${bindir}/c++filt \
> > >  	${bindir}/gprof \
> > >  	${bindir}/ld \
> > > +	${bindir}/ld.bfd \
> > >  	${bindir}/nm \
> > >  	${bindir}/objcopy \
> > >  	${bindir}/objdump \
> > >  	${bindir}/ranlib \
> > >  	${bindir}/readelf \
> > > +	${bindir}/elfedit \
> > >  	${bindir}/size \
> > >  	${bindir}/strip"
> >
> > Nitin, do you know if the ld.bfd above is a hardlinked copy of ld?
> 
> If you're getting ld.bfd at all (at least with our current recipes)
> then
> it probably means that ${bindir}/ld is gold.  So in that case they
> oughtn't to be symlinked.
> 
Just verified that ld.bfd is a soft link to i586-poky-linux-ld.bfd

So what is the right think here, rm -f ld.bfd, or putting it in the symlinks package is good?

Nitin

> p.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core