[OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: ensure that NSS libs go into the right package when ${base_libdir} and ${libdir} are the same

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 15:16 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> > Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:26 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> > >> Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:08 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>> > >>
>> > >>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> > >>>> Previously, libnss_hesiod et al. could get swallowed by the wildcarded glob in ${PN}-dev.
>> > >>>> Fix it by moving eglibc-extra-nss earlier in the PACKAGES and adjusting its FILES to ensure
>> > >>>> that the devel symlinks don't get caught.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org>
>> > >>>> ---
>> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |    4 ++--
>> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb     |    2 +-
>> > >>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Merged to master, thanks.
>> > >>
>> > >> That is missing a PR bump for eglibc 2.12
>> > >
>> > > Oh yeah.  Do we really need to keep 2.12 around still?
>> >
>> > It's the default for angstrom, dunno if that's a good enough reason :)
>>
>> Does Angstrom have any plans to switch to 2.13?
>>
>> Certainly we're not aware of issues with 2.13 and as such we should
>> really consider phasing out 2.12 from OE-Core at least...
>
> How about glibc 2.10; is anybody still using that at all?

I think all glibc recipes should go away.

>
> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>