[OE-core] [PATCH] uclibc: improve packaging granularity

[Phil Blundell]

On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 18:13 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> > > -FILES_uclibc-dev_append = "\
> > > +FILES_${PN}-dev_append = "\
> > 
> > same uclibc.inc is also used by uclibc-initial recipe so using ${PN}
> > may not be ok here
> 
> Does uclibc-initial generate any PACKAGES?  I rather assumed it was
> sysroot only, in which case the FILES are irrelevant.
> 
> In any case, the name of the FILES variable needs to match the value in
> PACKAGES.  Having "FILES_uclibc-dev" is no good if PACKAGES talks about
> "${PN}-dev", which appears to be the case here.

... and, maybe more to the point, it's also no good to be doing
"FILES_uclibc-dev_append" when there is a ${PN}-dev definition in
bitbake.conf.  They need to be consistent.

p.