[OE-core] lib vs lib64?

[Kumar Gala]

On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote:

> On 07/28/2011 07:17 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 09:15 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> With recent multilib changes for a pure 64-bit target (no multilib) should things be in /lib or /lib64?
>> 
>> They should be in ${base_libdir}.  Whether that's /lib or /lib64 is a
>> DISTRO choice I suppose.
> 
> Assuming the libc has been patched for that arch.  Or do we no longer
> need that change?  I know there was a patch for mips64 to look at /lib
> not /lib64 for ld.so, etc, etc.

Yeah, the issue I'm running into seems related to:

commit 6c936b4b1a2fb1bdf1f3f91482af7e33e71b5c10
Author: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed Jul 27 10:19:30 2011 +0100

    gcc: Drop part of the 64bithack patch which is no longer used
    
    Since we now handle GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in gcc-configure-common.inc:
    
    's#\(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER[^ ]*\)\( *"/lib.*\)#\1 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR\2#'

And it not doing what is expected.

- k