[OE-core] List of bbappends without matching recipes

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Thu Jun 9 15:32:39 UTC 2011


Op 9 jun 2011, om 17:24 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:

> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> Hey,
>> 
>> I ran bitbake layers on a stock angstrom setup and it reported a lot of 'broken' bbappends:
>> 
>> meta-intel:
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
> 
> Don't these match the -stable (soon to be 2.6.34) kernel recipe ?
> 
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bb
> 
> or maybe I'm just missing something, you did have 'broken' in
> quotes :)

I but it in quotes because I have a hard time believing that the linux-yocto appends are really broken :) But this is what 'bitbake layers' outputs, so there is *something* wrong, but I don't know where. RP is doing some heavy work on bitbake/master and bitbake/poky-master so I might have triggered a bug(fix) somewhere by updating bitbake. I don't want to discourage RP from bitbake work, just saying that I'm tracking bitbake master closely.



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list