[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] eglibc: migrate configurability from oe

[Kang Kai]

On 2011年06月13日 17:27, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:15 +0800, Kang Kai wrote:
>> On 2011年06月13日 17:05, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:01 +0800, Kang Kai wrote:
>>>> -DISTRO_FEATURES ?= "alsa bluetooth ext2 irda pcmcia usbgadget usbhost wifi nfs zeroconf pci"
>>>> +DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC ?= "ipv6 libc-backtrace libc-big-macros libc-bsd libc-cxx-tests libc-catgets libc-charsets libc-crypt \
>>>> +					libc-crypt-ufc libc-db-aliases libc-envz libc-fcvt libc-fmtmsg libc-fstab libc-ftraverse \
>>>> +					libc-getlogin libc-idn libc-inet libc-inet-anl libc-libm libc-libm-big libc-locales libc-locale-code \
>>>> +					libc-memusage libc-nis libc-nsswitch libc-rcmd libc-rtld-debug libc-spawn libc-streams libc-sunrpc \
>>>> +					libc-utmp libc-utmpx libc-wordexp libc-posix-clang-wchar libc-posix-regexp libc-posix-regexp-glibc \
>>>> +					libc-posix-wchar-io"
>>>> +
>>>> +DISTRO_FEATURES ?= "alsa bluetooth ext2 irda pcmcia usbgadget usbhost wifi nfs zeroconf pci ${DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC}"
>>> Why is ipv6 in DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC rather than DISTRO_FEATURES?
>> Because eglibc has a feature libc-ipv6, and DISTRO_FEATURES has a ipv6
>> already. It is not needed to import a new feature name on the same
>> things, so use original ipv6. And eglibc still needs provide this
>> option, then put it in DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC.
> I'm not quite sure I understood what you wrote above.  But I think what
> I was asking was, why doesn't eglibc just look at the existing ipv6
> DISTRO_FEATURE?

It seems DISTRO_FEATURE doesn't want to enable ipv6 by default, but 
eglibc needs supports it.

> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core