[OE-core] Where is atom-pc.conf hiding?
Koen Kooi
koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Tue Jun 14 07:40:32 UTC 2011
Op 13 jun 2011, om 23:30 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was seeing[1] and I ran into another bug:
>>>>
>>>> koen at dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf | grep atom
>>>> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold 2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800 6) require conf/machine/atom-pc.conf
>>>>
>>> meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look!
>>>
>>> I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this like of dependency.
>>
>> Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new
>> parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard
>> stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well.
>> That surely isn't the intended plan?!?!
>
> The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as
> the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo
> (which at present its not but its certainly the intent).
So can someone at least put that in the meta-intel or meta-n450 README? Most layers now have a README with the dependency info (e.g. http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=meta-smartphone.git;a=blob;f=meta-palm/README;h=200a3c83ff11ad790fe4e03e93a26520ec0c6714;hb=HEAD ) It would be nice if the ones on yocto-project.org had somethign similar :)
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list