[OE-core] [PATCH] allarch.bbclass: Set FEED_ARCH to 'allarch'
Phil Blundell
pb at pbcl.net
Tue Jun 14 09:40:31 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> PACKAGE_ARCH is set to BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH so we do not
> need to define it here since we already define BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH
>
> Additionally set FEED_ARCH to 'allarch' some distros e.g.
> angstrom sets FEED_ARCH like
>
> FEED_ARCH ?= "${BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH}"
Um? Surely if FEED_ARCH is defined in terms of B_P_A then just setting
the latter variable ought to be enough. Why do you need to set both?
> and 'all' doesnt go well for FEED_ARCH as it ends up with
> parsing error for x86 machines.
That sounds a bit odd as well. I wouldn't have expected any value of
FEED_ARCH to result in parsing errors. What actually goes wrong?
p.
>
> This might be a latent bug in bitbake but allarch.bbclass
> excavated it and we burry it in the same class.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/allarch.bbclass | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass b/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass
> index e3ac392..971cb92 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass
> @@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
> # This class is used for architecture independent recipes/data files (usally scripts)
> #
>
> -BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "all"
> -PACKAGE_ARCH = "all"
> -
> +BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "allarch"
> +FEED_ARCH = "allarch"
> # No need for virtual/libc or a cross compiler
> INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list