[OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Fri May 6 14:43:37 UTC 2011


On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:32:08PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> 
> Op 6 mei 2011, om 15:54 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:51:58AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> >>> And related to this: how do I get the "installed but not packaged" output back? The bitbake logging changes are hiding it now, which is counterproductive.
> >> 
> >> Could change those messages from info to warnings, then they'd show up.
> > 
> > Agreed, please change it. I'm using -v since those were not shown, but -v 
> > brings much more noise then I need.
> 
> Like this?
> 
> --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ python populate_packages () {
>                                 unshipped.append(path)
>  
>         if unshipped != []:
> -               bb.note("the following files were installed but not shipped in any package:")
> +               bb.warn("the following files were installed but not shipped in any package:")
>                 for f in unshipped:


I prefer also with files
-                         bb.note("  " + f)
+                         bb.warn("  " + f)

because later when reading logs from build I can see if it was something
important or just some file I don't need

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list