[OE-core] [PATCH 3/8] puzzles: update to r9173

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 13:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 11:37 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../puzzles/{puzzles_r9163.bb => puzzles_r9173.bb} |    0
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  rename meta/recipes-sato/puzzles/{puzzles_r9163.bb => puzzles_r9173.bb} (100%)
> 
> No doubt the patch is fine, but why is this recipe in oe-core at all?
> It doesn't seem to fit any reasonable definition of "core" functionality
> that I can immediately think of.

This is a discussion that the TSC had. Somehow we need the ensure we had
the ability to test oe-core easily and extensively and sato is a pretty
contained way to do that. Originally I'd expected sato to get split into
its own layer but we didn't do that for this reason.

Cheers,

Richard