[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] distcc: make distccmon-gnome optional and default to off

[Paul Menzel]

Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 21:48 +0000 schrieb Richard Purdie:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:55 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Op 14 nov. 2011, om 21:39 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> > > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:17 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > >> I think splitting distccmon-gnome into a seperate recipe is a better idea.
> > > 
> > > I think that makes sense in some cases but I'd hate for it to become the
> > > default approach for issues like this as the duplication of code,
> > > parsing and build time etc. grate on me. Do we really need separate
> > > recipes?
> > 
> > I think for this case, yes. And I'll happily trade needing extra
> > buildtime for not needing USEFLAGS.
> > 
> The proposals for alternative recipes for the different combinations got
> voted down and PACKAGECONFIG was the preferred solution.

Where is this vote (and discussion) documented? I found nothing in the
OE Wiki and searching for it with »openembedded packageconfig vote
oe-core list« brought up only some minutes [1].

I also do not remember anything on openembedded-devel where such general
discussion definitely belong in my opinion.

It would be great if somebody could help me by giving me an URL.

> I can't say I personally like everything about the outcome. I do
> however understand why we've ended up in that position and don't
> intend to undermine the usefulness of it.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core/7688
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20111115/c189be22/attachment-0002.sig>