[OE-core] [PATCH] Add PATCHRESOLVE to excluded vars for generating sstate-cache

Matthew McClintock msm at freescale.com
Thu Nov 17 22:42:47 UTC 2011


The method of resolving the patch should not effect the sstate-cache
signature.

Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm at freescale.com>
---
I'm not 100% sure about this one either - should we even generate
sstate-cache at all if we have a scenario where we try to resolve
a patch?

 meta/classes/patch.bbclass |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/patch.bbclass b/meta/classes/patch.bbclass
index 7622163..5f9765c 100644
--- a/meta/classes/patch.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/patch.bbclass
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ python patch_do_patch() {
 			raise bb.build.FuncFailed(str(sys.exc_value))
 		resolver.Resolve()
 }
-patch_do_patch[vardepsexclude] = "DATE SRCDATE"
+patch_do_patch[vardepsexclude] = "DATE SRCDATE PATCHRESOLVE"
 
 addtask patch after do_unpack
 do_patch[dirs] = "${WORKDIR}"
-- 
1.7.6.1






More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list