[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 00/13] Xorg related changes

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:38 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:28:39PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:26 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > this patchset brings meta-oe and oe-core xorg stuff together and most of 
> > > xorg recipes will be removed from meta-oe (sending another pull request now).
> > > 
> > > This step is needed to be able to separate common x11 to meta-x11 or whatever later.
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit 96241de59fdf548ae0f80cc9e4668f9ba11924ef:
> > > 
> > >   Fix flac build on e500mc cores (2011-09-29 19:31:38 +0100)
> > > 
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >   git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib jansa/x11
> > >   http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/x11
> > > 
> > > Martin Jansa (13):
> > >  xorg-driver: rename .inc files and merge some changes from meta-oe
> > >  libxft, libxrender, renderproto: add native BBCLASSEXTEND
> > >  xorg-app-common: merge some changes from meta-oe
> > >  xf86-video-omapfb: bump SRCREV and add patch from meta-oe
> > >  rgb: import from meta-oe layer
> > >  libdrm: improve packaging
> > 
> > I'll take these ones. I've queued them on a master-next branch for now
> > as I want to give other people some time to comment on them. If there
> > isn't negative feedback I'll take them in ~24 hours.
> > 
> > I've given feedback on why I think these need further work:
> > 
> > >   xserver-xf86: upgrade to 1.11.0 and move shared definitions to .inc
> > >     files
> > >   xserver-xf86-dri-lite: remove COMPATIBLE_HOST
> > >   libx11: upgrade to 1.4.4
> > >   default-providers: define PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11-native
> > >   xserver-nodm-init: merge some changes from meta-oe
> > >  glx-use-tls: add from meta-oe layer
> > >  mesa: upgrade to 7.11
> 
> I've updated jansa/x11 branch according to your comments, now 17 patches
> instead of 7 :).
> 
> Before I send updated pull-request, what do you think about renaming
> xserver-xf86 to xserver-xorg which is closer to upstream naming and
> that's how it's named in OE-classic and meta-oe? It would make meta-oe
> transition easier and better to do it now then convert meta-oe to
> xserver-xf86 and then rename it back later.

I'm ok with renaming it. I think the historical reasons for the
differences don't matter now.

Cheers,

Richard