[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 02/13] xserver-xf86-dri-lite: remove COMPATIBLE_HOST

[Martin Jansa]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:10:02PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On 9/30/2011 12:27 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * ie om-gta02 has mesa-dri module too
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   .../xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc         |    3 ---
> >   1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc
> > index 093e049..2e35917 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc
> > @@ -10,6 +10,3 @@ EXTRA_OECONF += "\
> >                    --with-pic \
> >                    --with-int10=x86emu \
> >   "
> > -
> > -# Due to mesa-dri
> > -COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86.*-linux|x86_64.*-linux)'
> 
> how about powerpc and mips ? they will also become supported with this 
> change have you tested that

Haven't tested it but iirc building dri extension worked even for
powerpc and mips in OE-classic and because xserver-xf86-dri-lite get's
default later in this patchset I think it's better without
overrestrictive COMPATIBLE_HOST.

And as the comment says, the restriction should be in mesa-dri if
somewhere (at least only in one place to .bbappend my COMPATIBLE_HOSTs
in layer).

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20111004/ad0b62bb/attachment-0002.sig>