[OE-core] [PATCH] Improve handling of 'all' architecture recipes and their interaction with sstate

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Wed Oct 5 12:29:10 UTC 2011



Op 5 okt. 2011 om 07:27 heeft Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> het volgende geschreven:

> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 09:22, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> Op 5 okt. 2011 om 07:10 heeft Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> het volgende geschreven:
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 19:00, Richard Purdie
>>> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> Really? hal doesn't really replace udev though, we can just use udev
>>>> directly in place of it for many things now?
>>> 
>>> Yes, many moved from hal to udev.
>>> 
>>>> Specifically which applications are people using with dependencies on
>>>> hal? As has been pointed out we can fix the xserver and that appears to
>>>> be the only thing remaining in OE-Core?
>>> 
>>> OE-Core can be easily hal-less but I just ask for hal to not be
>>> removed from meta data as I and probably others hasn't finish the move
>>> to udev yet.
>> 
>> Put it in your own layer if you need it. No point in keeping obsolete stuff in oe-core.
> 
> I wouldn't call it obsolete as it is still a valid option to Xorg and
> maybe others. So people might want to use it. I use it.

So put it in your own layer, it has no place in oe-core anymore.


> 
> -- 
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list