[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 20/27] libtool: Upgrade from 2.4 -> 2.4.2

[Koen Kooi]

Op 24 okt. 2011, om 15:34 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:

> On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 11:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> From: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> 
>> Adjust prefix.patch and delete resolve-sysroot.patch
>> since its already applied upstream
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .../libtool/{libtool.inc => libtool-2.4.2.inc}     |   26 +++++++++---
>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.inc      |   13 ------
>> ...libtool-cross_2.4.bb => libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} |    2 +-
>> ...btool-native_2.4.bb => libtool-native_2.4.2.bb} |    2 +-
>> ...nativesdk_2.4.bb => libtool-nativesdk_2.4.2.bb} |    2 +-
>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/prefix.patch |   46 ++++++++++----------
>> .../libtool/libtool/resolve-sysroot.patch          |   42 ------------------
>> .../libtool/{libtool_2.4.bb => libtool_2.4.2.bb}   |    2 +-
>> 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool.inc => libtool-2.4.2.inc} (57%)
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.inc
>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-cross_2.4.bb => libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} (98%)
>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-native_2.4.bb => libtool-native_2.4.2.bb} (96%)
>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-nativesdk_2.4.bb => libtool-nativesdk_2.4.2.bb} (97%)
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/resolve-sysroot.patch
>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool_2.4.bb => libtool_2.4.2.bb} (94%)
>> 
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc
>> similarity index 57%
>> rename from meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc
>> rename to meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc
>> index ef9095b..1f652ef 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc
>> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
>> -SUMMARY = "Generic library support script"
> 
> Why drop the SUMMARY field?

What's the difference between SUMMARY and DESCRIPTION? And what happens if both are set?

regards,

Koen