[OE-core] [PATCH] insane: Promote most warnings into QA errors by default

Saul Wold sgw at linux.intel.com
Mon Sep 26 23:08:01 UTC 2011


On 09/26/2011 02:51 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:24 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> We agreed a while back that we'd start ERRORing on QA issues, not just
>> WARNING about them. This patch changes the default QA levels to error
>> on everything except ldflag and useless rpath issues.
>>
>> It also stops giving out QA warnings about desktop files since it
>> adds noise to the build and until someone plans to seriously tackle
>> that problem, its pointless.
>>
>> We can promote the ldflag and rpath warnings too, when the issues
>> in OE-Core are resolved (they're mostly there now, jsut a few more
>> to go).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
>> index addb9ac..62935c3 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
>> @@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ def package_qa_get_machine_dict():
>>          }
>>
>>
>> -WARN_QA ?= "dev-so rpaths debug-deps dev-deps debug-files arch la2 pkgconfig desktop la ldflags perms useless-rpaths"
>> -ERROR_QA ?= ""
>> -#ERROR_QA ?= "rpaths debug-deps dev-deps debug-files arch pkgconfig perms"
>> +# Currently not being used by default "desktop"
>> +WARN_QA ?= "ldflags useless-rpaths"
>> +ERROR_QA ?= "dev-so rpaths debug-deps dev-deps debug-files arch la2 pkgconfig la perms"
>>
>
> Further testing shows we may not be ready to move rpath to ERROR_QA
> quite yet but the rest of the proposal still stands...
>
How bad is the breakage in a world build?

I will probably attempt this later or tomorrow.

Sau!
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list