[OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] kernel.bbclass: move uImage handling to separate task

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 13:39:09 UTC 2011


On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
> separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's
> version (not to recreate uImage if it exists) is retained in this patch.

I'm getting around to commenting on this patch series, sorry for the
slow replies.
Things have been a bit busy.

This seems reasonable to me, but I was wondering if we could document in the
commit header why this is a good thing ? Not everyone is familiar with oe-dev
or the history behind these changes. Having to cross reference to another
repository for the high level reasoning behind a change is not really
ideal, and
tossing something into the commit that explains things a bit is minimal up
front effort.

What I mean is "sync'ing oe-core to oe-dev" isn't the reason I'd like
to see. Are
the advantages that breaking this out into a separate task that it allows finer
grained scheduling by bitbake ? flexibility to be done at different times, etc ?

But the change does seem reasonable to me, I'm just looking to capture some
of the technical advantages in the commit messages.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> index b44e3b5..6ff4018 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> @@ -486,6 +486,30 @@ do_sizecheck() {
>
>  addtask sizecheck before do_install after do_compile
>
> +do_uboot_mkimage() {
> +    if test "x${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}" = "xuImage" -a \
> +            ! -e arch/${ARCH}/boot/uImage ; then
> +        ENTRYPOINT=${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}
> +        if test -n "${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}"; then
> +            ENTRYPOINT=`${HOST_PREFIX}nm ${S}/vmlinux | \
> +                   awk '$3=="${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}" {print $1}'`
> +        fi
> +        if test -e arch/${ARCH}/boot/compressed/vmlinux ; then
> +            ${OBJCOPY} -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S arch/${ARCH}/boot/compressed/vmlinux linux.bin
> +            uboot-mkimage -A ${UBOOT_ARCH} -O linux -T kernel -C none -a ${UBOOT_LOADADDRESS} -e $ENTRYPOINT -n "${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}" -d linux.bin arch/${ARCH}/boot/uImage
> +            rm -f linux.bin
> +        else
> +            ${OBJCOPY} -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S vmlinux linux.bin
> +            rm -f linux.bin.gz
> +            gzip -9 linux.bin
> +            uboot-mkimage -A ${UBOOT_ARCH} -O linux -T kernel -C gzip -a ${UBOOT_LOADADDRESS} -e $ENTRYPOINT -n "${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}" -d linux.bin.gz arch/${ARCH}/boot/uImage
> +            rm -f linux.bin.gz
> +        fi
> +    fi
> +}
> +
> +addtask uboot_mkimage before do_install after do_compile
> +
>  KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME ?= "${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-${PV}-${PR}-${MACHINE}-${DATETIME}"
>  # Don't include the DATETIME variable in the sstate package signatures
>  KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME[vardepsexclude] = "DATETIME"
> @@ -497,22 +521,6 @@ kernel_do_deploy() {
>                tar -cvzf ${DEPLOYDIR}/modules-${KERNEL_VERSION}-${PR}-${MACHINE}.tgz -C ${D} lib
>        fi
>
> -       if test "x${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}" = "xuImage" ; then
> -               if test -e arch/${ARCH}/boot/uImage ; then
> -                       cp arch/${ARCH}/boot/uImage ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin
> -               elif test -e arch/${ARCH}/boot/compressed/vmlinux ; then
> -                       ${OBJCOPY} -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S arch/${ARCH}/boot/compressed/vmlinux linux.bin
> -                       uboot-mkimage -A ${ARCH} -O linux -T kernel -C none -a ${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT} -e ${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT} -n "${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}" -d linux.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin
> -                       rm -f linux.bin
> -               else
> -                       ${OBJCOPY} -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S vmlinux linux.bin
> -                       rm -f linux.bin.gz
> -                       gzip -9 linux.bin
> -                       uboot-mkimage -A ${ARCH} -O linux -T kernel -C gzip -a ${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT} -e ${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT} -n "${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}" -d linux.bin.gz ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin
> -                       rm -f linux.bin.gz
> -               fi
> -       fi
> -
>        cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
>        rm -f ${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
>        ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list