[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 05/13] default-providers: define PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11-native
Richard Purdie
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Sep 30 11:07:34 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:27 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
> index d51ac64..7ff7891 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgl ?= "mesa-xlib"
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/update-alternatives ?= "update-alternatives-cworth"
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/update-alternatives-native ?= "opkg-native"
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11 ?= "libx11-trim"
> +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11-native ?= "libx11-native"
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_xf86-video-intel ?= "xf86-video-intel"
This is a symptom of a problem. Why do we need libx11-trim-native and
libx11-diet-native?
If the BBCLASSEXTEND is in the right place we don't have this problem...
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list