[OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule

[Flanagan, Elizabeth]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:32:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 14:22, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
> wrote:
> > > You just volunteered to handle all the "Does it work with yocto 1.2?"
> questions :)
> > >
> > > Simply put: people are stupid, they need explicit PHB compliant names
> in tags, even if it isn't 100% politically correct to say "yocto" when we
> actually mean "oe-core".
> > >
> > > Unless the yocto 1.2 release note state that it's based on oe-core
> "foo" and all layers compatible with "foo" use "foo" in tags/branches.
> >
> > I think layers ought to have tags for both ...
> >
> > <layer>-oe-core-<tag>
> > <layer>-yocto-<tag>
>
> And <layer>-poky-<tag> for completeness?
>
> Seriously, "yocto"-naming schema is not that bad. For shortness, it can be
> "yp-1.2" as a suffix to the layer-specific tags...
>
> But I'm flexible with other naming schemas, such as "YYYY.MM" or "YYYY.#"
>
>
I'm open to whatever naming scheme people want to decide on with few
caveats. That it be painstakingly documented. That it can handle point
releases and release candidates. I personally like YYYY.MM schemes, but, in
the end, all I care about is that it's flexible, agreed upon and very well
documented.

-b

--
> Denys
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



-- 
Elizabeth Flanagan
Yocto Project
Build and Release
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120412/2d408178/attachment-0002.html>