[OE-core] MIPS vs MIPS32 tunings -- summary and questions

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that had mipsel or
> mipsel-nf in their name and contents, and after having changed all
> occurrences of mipsel and mipsel-nf in my local recipes (where
> appropriate), and after having rebuilt everything from scratch again, it
> came to my attention that "mipsel" in PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS breaks opkg,
> because no mipsel packages are being generated. That's what I told
> before, right?

How is this breaking opkg? We often have architectures listed in there
for which there are no packages generated (all, noarch and any spring to
mind)?

Cheers,

Richard